Richard Donner’s Superman
(1978)- starring Christopher Reeve- made people believe a man could fly and
laid the seeds for the domination of the superhero genre years later. But if
Superman is the father of the superhero genre than Tim Burton’s Batman (1989) is its creepy uncle. Today
marks the 25th anniversary of Batman’s
release and in the 25 years since the superhero genre has evolved significantly, with superhero films
becoming the dominant blockbusters of modern cinema. Many superhero films now feel manufactured
but Batman is still a distinct and
twisted vision- funny, dark, and compulsively re-watchable even after the impact
of Christopher Nolan’s Batman trilogy.
Before Batman’s
release many non-comic readers’ image of the Caped Crusader was of the
1960s Adam West TV series. Those more familiar with the comics became accustomed to a darker vision of the character thanks
to late 80s takes on the character such as Frank Miller's Batman Year One and The Dark
Knight Returns, as well as Alan Moore’s The
Killing Joke. Batman brought that
more mature take on the character to life, aiming to satisfy comic fans and to
show that the character was more than the comedic West series.
Though before the
film was released many were afraid the film would be an updated version of the 60s
series. These fears stemmed from the casting of Michael Keaton, best known for his
performances in comedies such as Night
Shift and Mr. Mom. People presumed Keaton’s presence meant the film would be a comedy. Upon hearing
about the controversy Jon Peters- one of the film’s producers- released a trailer,
highlighting the film’s dark tone, to squash peoples’ fears about the casting.
In many ways Keaton’s casting was the first controversial casting in a superhero
film. Heath Ledger, Robert Downey Jr., and now Ben Affleck as the new Batman
would follow in the years to come.
While actors such as Willem Dafoe (who would go on to play
the Green Goblin in Sam Raimi’s first Spider-Man),
John Lithgow, and Tim Curry were considered for the role of Batman’s nemesis the
Joker, screen legend Jack Nicholson was chosen. He had been a favourite of
producer Michael Uslan for the role since the early 80s. Nicholson’s contract
gave him a large percentage of the film’s gross along with his salary for the film.
Many criticize Nicholson for playing himself in the role of the
Joker but whether you’re a fan of the performance or Nicholson as an actor, he’s
much more memorable than several recent super-villains of the superhero genre. Personally, I find Nicholson incredibly entertaining in the role
and get a kick out of his dialogue: “Can somebody tell me what kind of world we live in, where a
man dressed up like a bat gets all of my press?” “Where does he get all those
wonderful toys.” This film established the tradition of getting big names to
play Batman villains- Jim Carrey as the Riddler, Arnold Schwarzenegger as Mr.
Freeze, etc. A significant flaw in the Batman franchise is that the
villains would always get more back-story than Batman and would often
overshadow the character in his own movies.
Tim Burton was a relatively new director to feature
filmmaking at this time, having mostly directed shorts and two feature length
films- Pee Wee’s Big Adventure and Beetlejuice, which starred Keaton. Burton was a risky choice to handle
such a big property but this film would solidify Burton as a big Hollywood
filmmaker. Burton was not a fan of comics growing up but he admired The Killing Joke and The Dark Knight Returns.
Burton actually pays homage to Moore’s
version of the Joker’s origin story. In both
Batman and The Killing Joke the Joker’s
origin involves Jack Napier (in the film)/the unnamed engineer (Killing Joke) falling in to a vat of acid
and going insane upon seeing his reflection, his skin now bleached. What’s noticeable
about Batman is it’s more of a Joker origin
story than Batman origin story. While Superman and future superhero films focus
on the hero’s origin, in Batman the
titular character has already taken on the mantle of a vigilante. It's not until later on in the film that Batman's origin is revealed when Bruce Wayne thinks back to the
night his parents were murdered. One of the most striking departures this film
makes from the comics is that Napier, when he was a young hoodlum, was the
murderer of Bruce’s parents. To my knowledge this is the first and only incarnation that
interprets the Joker this way. This controversial re-interpretation is one the
boldest changes in a superhero themed film and foreshadows the risks filmmakers
would take when re-interpreting comic book mythology.
Burton keeps the character of Bruce Wayne/Batman largely a
mystery to the viewer. Thus we need a character to be a representation for the
audience. The character we actually follow throughout the film is Vicki Vale
(Kim Basinger), a photographer who’s come to Gotham City due to her interest in
the rumours about Batman and teams up with reporter Alexander Knox (Robert Wuhl), who's also obsessed in discovering who or what Batman is.
Vicki begins a romance with Bruce and it’s through this relationship we discover who the real Bruce Wayne is behind the rich playboy facade. A large
theme of the film is that Bruce has been locked away behind facades for so long
that he doesn’t quite know how to embark on a courtship.
Unlike West, Keaton creates a distinction between the two
personas of Bruce Wayne and Batman, emphasizing the character's dual psyche. Keaton puts
fears to rest as soon as the film opens with Batman beating up two criminals
who committed a mugging that echoes the character’s origin. Gone is the “old
chum” Batman of the 60s series. Keaton’s Batman is a stoic, intimidating
creature who strikes fear in to the hearts of criminals.
Batman came out in
1989. At this time the blockbuster/action movie scene was populated by Schwarzenegger,
Stallone, Indiana Jones and John McClane. This was long before the comic book
superhero was the dominant franchise headliner at the cineplex. Despite his
popularity, Batman wasn’t the hero people were used to seeing on screen. And Keaton was not anyone’s image of an action
hero. But this is what makes the film and why it had such an impact upon its
release. It wasn’t like anything people were seeing at this time.
This is largely due to its production designs, which places
Batman outside of any specific time setting. There’s a distinct 1930s/1940s
vibe to the gangsters’ outfits, cars, etc. but the film doesn’t specifically
take place during that period. Aside from the inclusion of music from Prince in
one sequence the film’s aesthetic qualities lend it a timeless feel. Similar to
the Christopher Reeve Superman films,
the film attempts to creates a stylized reality rather than place the
character in a modern setting.
The success of Batman led to the creation of the great Batman: The Animated Series, which
premiered in 1992 and ran until 1998. The style of the series was influenced by
Batman.
The film's success also made Warner Bros. give Burton creative control over the
sequel, Batman Returns. The result was one of the darkest, depressing, and most twisted films,
superhero or otherwise, to come out of a major studio. The darkness turned off
people, namely parents who dragged their kids off to see it.. Warner Bros. then went in another direction and
hired Joel Schumacher to helm Batman
Forever, a much lighter take on the character.
I can’t call Batman
a masterpiece or a great film but it’s a memorable, highly entertaining piece
of pop entertainment. It's beautifully gothic and an interesting prototype for the future films in the franchise. Happy 25th anniversary Batman.
No comments:
Post a Comment